0
  • DE
  • EN
  • FR
  • Base de données et galerie internationale d'ouvrages d'art et du génie civil

Publicité

A Comparison Study of Reinforcement Design Methods of Concrete Box Girder Bridges Considering Spatial Effects

A Comparison Study of Reinforcement Design Methods of Concrete Box Girder Bridges Considering Spatial Effects
Auteur(s): , , ,
Présenté pendant IABSE Congress: Bridges and Structures: Connection, Integration and Harmonisation, Nanjing, People's Republic of China, 21-23 September 2022, publié dans , pp. 583-591
DOI: 10.2749/nanjing.2022.0583
Prix: € 25,00 incl. TVA pour document PDF  
AJOUTER AU PANIER
Télécharger l'aperçu (fichier PDF) 0.15 MB

At present, typical reinforcement methods of box girders able to consider spatial effects are known as the amplification factor method, "panel element model" method, and the "spatial grid model" me...
Lire plus

Détails bibliographiques

Auteur(s): (Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China)
(Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China)
(Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China (Corresponding author))
(Tongji University, Shanghai, China)
Médium: papier de conférence
Langue(s): anglais
Conférence: IABSE Congress: Bridges and Structures: Connection, Integration and Harmonisation, Nanjing, People's Republic of China, 21-23 September 2022
Publié dans:
Page(s): 583-591 Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 9
Page(s): 583-591
Nombre total de pages (du PDF): 9
DOI: 10.2749/nanjing.2022.0583
Abstrait:

At present, typical reinforcement methods of box girders able to consider spatial effects are known as the amplification factor method, "panel element model" method, and the "spatial grid model" method. However, the differences between these methods have not been investigated.

In this paper, these methods are compared in terms of the full spatial resistances of box-girders, by evaluating the reinforcement results in an example. A surplus indicator in different directions in terms of the ultimate bearing capacity and normal section crack resistance is defined. The results show that in the mid-span section, the amplification factor method is prone to over-limiting the principal tensile stresses at the bottom panel near the web, and the other two methods have the good load-bearing capacity and crack resistance in all directions, but the reinforcement (especially for the spatial grid model method) is too conservative at the web and bottom panel.

Mots-clé:
caisson
Copyright: © 2022 International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
License:

Cette oeuvre ne peut être utilisée sans la permission de l'auteur ou détenteur des droits.